IT. Expert System.

RFC (proposed standard status)

IANA Allocation Guidelines for the IPv6 Routing Header. J. Arkko, S. Bradner. May 2010. RFC5871. (Format: TXT=4000 bytes) (Updates RFC2460) (Status: PROPOSED STANDARD) (DOI: 10.17487 / RFC5871)

 Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)                          J. Arkko
Request for Comments: 5871                                      Ericsson
Updates: 2460                                                 S. Bradner
Category: Standards Track                             Harvard University
ISSN: 2070-1721                                                 May 2010
         IANA Allocation Guidelines for the IPv6 Routing Header
   This document specifies the IANA guidelines for allocating new values
   for the Routing Type field in the IPv6 Routing Header.
Status of This Memo
   This is an Internet Standards Track document.
   This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force
   (IETF).  It represents the consensus of the IETF community.  It has
   received public review and has been approved for publication by the
   Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG).  Further information on
   Internet Standards is available in Section 2 of RFC 5741.
   Information about the current status of this document, any errata,
   and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at
Copyright Notice
   Copyright (c) 2010 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.
   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
   ( in effect on the date of
   publication of this document.  Please review these documents
   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
   to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must
   include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
   the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
   described in the Simplified BSD License.
Arkko & Bradner              Standards Track                    [Page 1]
RFC 5871                   IPv6 RH IANA Rules                   May 2010
1.  Introduction
   This document specifies the IANA guidelines [RFC5226] for allocating
   new values for the Routing Type field in the IPv6 Routing Header
   [RFC2460].  Previously, no IANA guidance existed for such
2.  IANA Considerations
   New Routing Type values are allocated through IETF Review or IESG
   Approval [RFC5226].
   Note that two experimental values (253 and 254) are already available
   for use [RFC4727].
3.  Security Considerations
   This specification does not change the security properties of the
   Routing Header.  However, past experience shows that it is easy to
   design routing headers that have significant problems [RFC5095].
4.  References
4.1.  Normative References
   [RFC2460]  Deering, S. and R. Hinden, "Internet Protocol, Version 6
              (IPv6) Specification", RFC 2460, December 1998.
   [RFC5226]  Narten, T. and H. Alvestrand, "Guidelines for Writing an
              IANA Considerations Section in RFCs", BCP 26, RFC 5226,
              May 2008.
4.2.  Informative References
   [RFC4727]  Fenner, B., "Experimental Values In IPv4, IPv6, ICMPv4,
              ICMPv6, UDP, and TCP Headers", RFC 4727, November 2006.
   [RFC5095]  Abley, J., Savola, P., and G. Neville-Neil, "Deprecation
              of Type 0 Routing Headers in IPv6", RFC 5095,
              December 2007.
Arkko & Bradner              Standards Track                    [Page 2]
RFC 5871                   IPv6 RH IANA Rules                   May 2010
Appendix A.  Changes from RFC 2460
   This document specifies only the IANA rules associated with the
   Routing Type field.
Authors' Addresses
   Jari Arkko
   Jorvas  02420
   Scott Bradner
   Harvard University
   Cambridge, MA  02138
   Phone: +1 617 495 3864
Arkko & Bradner              Standards Track                    [Page 3] 


Android Reference

Java basics

Java Enterprise Edition (EE)

Java Standard Edition (SE)





Java Script








Design patterns

RFC (standard status)

RFC (proposed standard status)

RFC (draft standard status)

RFC (informational status)

RFC (experimental status)

RFC (best current practice status)

RFC (historic status)

RFC (unknown status)

IT dictionary

All information of this service is derived from the free sources and is provided solely in the form of quotations. This service provides information and interfaces solely for the familiarization (not ownership) and under the "as is" condition.
Copyright 2016 © ELTASK.COM. All rights reserved.
Site is optimized for mobile devices.
Downloads: 1027 / 159174841. Delta: 0.22885 с