RFC (unknown status)
NIC view of standard host names. R.W. Watson. October 1971. RFC237. (Format: TXT=2212 bytes) (Obsoleted by RFC273) (Status: UNKNOWN) (DOI: 10.17487 / RFC237)
Network Working Group Richard W. Watson
Request for Comments: 237 October 5, 1971
The Nic's View of Standard Host Names
The NIC strongly favors standardization of host names. People will
get used to the names appearing on documents coming from or through
the NIC and so we would like the ones used by NIC and the ones used
in Telnets to agree. In the absence of agreed standard names, we
have chosen some. We are not particularly partial to the ones we are
using, but do feel any standard naming scheme take into account most
of the following considerations.
(1) Names consist of two parts, SITE and HOST, preferably
separated by a delimiter such as a dash.
(2) Site and Host names have some mnemonic value, if possible not
involving the name of the computer as computers will change, but
the organization running it will remain.
(3) We strongly recommend at least 8 characters be allowed,
including one delimiter. The NIC now uses 12 characters maximum.
(4) Assuming 8 character names, we recommend that the site name
be a maximum of 6 characters and that Host names at a given site
be unique in the first six characters. Thus, with the delimiter,
sites desiring to only have 4 characters in their tables can
accept all characters typed by the user and truncate to 6
characters and still achieve uniqueness.
(5) Once the NWG has set a standard syntax and names for present
Hosts, the NIC should be responsible for maintaining the standard
and assigning names to new hosts and other groups involved in
Network dialogue. Besides hosts there are NIC stations and
individuals in organizations not on the Net involved in the
Network dialogue. The NIC needs to assign names to these Network
affiliations and will use the rules set by the NWG.
[This RFC was put into machine readable form for entry]
[into the online RFC archives by H�l�ne Morin, Viag�nie 10/99]
Watson [Page 1]
Java Enterprise Edition (EE)
Java Standard Edition (SE)
RFC (standard status)
RFC (proposed standard status)
RFC (draft standard status)
RFC (informational status)
RFC (experimental status)
RFC (best current practice status)
RFC (historic status)
RFC (unknown status)
All information of this service is derived from the free sources and is provided solely in the form of quotations.
This service provides information and interfaces solely for the familiarization (not ownership) and under the "as is" condition.
Copyright 2016 © ELTASK.COM. All rights reserved.
Site is optimized for mobile devices.
Downloads: 196 / 158770813. Delta: 0.00204 с